I've always been dissapointed in the feedback I receive when submitting articles for publication. Even when my work is accepted the suggest given are often vague and unclear.
I know that most journals have some sort of form that reviewers complete but it seems that the form is not followed very carefully.
Therefore, I was wondering what kinds of expectations others have in regards to peer-review feedback for an academic article.
Submit your work to high-quality journals. Those journals (usually) make sure to get high-quality reviews for submitted papers. In my own experience, the quality of the reviews is strongly correlated with the quality of the journal.