I am advised to revise my paper about a novel clustering algorithm. From the responses of reviewers, I have this question:
"the authors must present insightful implications based on their experimental outcomes."
I haven't understood what the reviewer means? Does he ask about a real case study, because I applied my algorithm only to benchmark of the UCI Machine Learning Repository? Available: http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets.html.
Without reading the paper and reports, I can only guess, but it sounds to me that they are asking "Why do your experimental results matter? What do they tell us?"